皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
搜题
【简答题】
Americans no longer expect public figures, whether in speech or in writing, to command the English language with skill and gift. Nor do they aspire to such command themselves. In his latest book, Doing Our Own Thing: The Degradation of Language and Music and Why We Should Like, Care, John McWhorter, a linguist and controversialist of mixed liberal and conservative views, sees the triumph of 1960s counter-culture as responsible for the decline of formal English. Blaming the permissive 1960s is nothing new, but this is not yet another criticism against the decline in education. Mr. McWhorter's academic specialty is language history and change, and he sees the gradual disappearance of "whom", for example, to be natural and no more regreuable than the loss of the case-endings of Old English. But the cult of the authentic and the personal, "doing our own thing", has spelt the death of formal speech, writing, poetry and music. While even the modestly educated sought an elevated tone when they put pen to paper before the 1960s, even the most well regarded writing since then has sought to capture spoken English on the page. Equally, in poetry, the highly personal, per- formative genre is the only form. that could claim real liveliness. In both oral and written English, talking is triumphing over speaking, spontaneity over craft. Illustrated with an entertaining array of examples from both high and low culture, the trend that Mr. McWhorter documents is unmistakable. But it is less clear, to take the quietist of his subtitle, Why We Should, Like, Care. As a linguist, he acknowledges that all varieties of human language, including non-standard ones like Black English, can be powerfully expressive—there exists no language or dialect in the world that cannot convey comp]ex ideas, lie is not arguing, as many do, that we can no longer think straight because we do not talk properly. Russians have a deep love for their own language and carry large chunks of memorized poetry in their heads, while Italian politicians tend to elaborate speech that would seem old-fashioned to most English-speakers. Mr. McWhorter acknowledges that formal language is not strictly necessary, and proposes no radical education reforms—he is really grieving over the loss of something beautiful more than useful. We now take our English "on paper plates instead of china". A shame, perhaps, but probably an inevitable one.
拍照语音搜题,微信中搜索"皮皮学"使用
参考答案:
参考解析:
知识点:
.
..
皮皮学刷刷变学霸
举一反三
【多选题】进出肝门的结构
A.
肝固有动脉
B.
肝静脉
C.
门静脉
D.
肝管
E.
神经
【多选题】进出肝门的结构有
A.
肝固有动脉
B.
肝静脉
C.
肝管
D.
门静脉
E.
神经
【单选题】正常人体内的酸碱度(pH值)稳定在7.35-7.45之间,是偏碱性的。之所以这么稳定,其原因在于人体有三大调节系统,分别为体内缓冲系统调节、肺调节和肾脏调节。如果体内的pH值低于7.35,就属于"酸中毒"。有一种理论认为,癌症患者几乎都是酸性体质,因此酸性体质会诱发癌症。以下哪项如果为真,最能质疑这一理论()
A.
现代医学研究证实,癌症是由多种因素导致的
B.
健康人体内的pH值一般不会受摄入食物的影响而改变
C.
人的身体处于"酸中毒"状态,若未得到及时治疗,不出几天就会死亡
D.
没有证据表明癌症患者的人体调节系统失常,"酸性体质"难以界定
【单选题】经肝门进出肝的结构是
A.
肝静脉
B.
下腔静脉
C.
肝固有动脉
D.
肝总动脉
E.
胆总管
【单选题】正常人体内的酸碱度(PH值)稳定在7.3—7.45之间,是偏碱性的。之所以这么稳定,其原因在于人体有三大调节系统,分别为体内缓冲系统调节、肺调节和肾脏调节。如果体内的PH值低于7.35,就属于“酸中毒”。有一种理论认为,癌症患者几乎都是酸性体质,因此酸性体质会诱发癌症。以下哪项如果为真,最能质疑这一理论?()
A.
现代医学研究证实,癌症是由多种因素导致的
B.
健康人体内的PH值一般不会受摄入食物的影响而改变
C.
人的身体处于“酸中毒”状态,若未得到及时治疗,不出几天就会死亡
D.
没有证据表明癌症患者的人体调节系统失常,“酸性体质”难以界定
【单选题】植物分类的基本单位是
A.
B.
C.
D.
品种
【多选题】进出肝门的结构有
A.
肝固有动脉
B.
肝静脉
C.
肝门静脉
D.
肝管
E.
神经
【多选题】进出肝门的结构有
A.
肝静脉
B.
肝固有动脉
C.
肝管
D.
神经
E.
门静脉
【单选题】植物分类的基本单位是
A.
B.
C.
D.
亚种
【单选题】人体最大的调节系统是?
A.
运动系统
B.
循环系统
C.
神经系统
D.
内分泌系统
相关题目: