The ability to speak more than one language certainly has its special benefits. It enables you to work in another country or interact with people whose language is different from your mother tongue. Cognitive (认知的) psychologists have been interested in how bilingualism (双语能力) shapes the mind for almost a century. There are those who suggest that in order to speak one language, bilinguals have to suppress (抑制) the influence of the other. In the past three decades, research had argued that this unique form of language processing trains the brain in the use of abilities known as "executive (执行的) functions" such as ignoring irrelevant information or shifting attention. Bilinguals of different ages and cultural backgrounds have been shown to be faster and more accurate than their monolingual (的) peers when performing cognitive tasks demanding these abilities. Furthermore, it has been argued that bilingualism may lead to a delayed onset (发作) of symptoms associated with dementia (痴呆) . But the scientific community recently has become increasingly skeptical of the bilingual advantage. One of the main points of criticism is that differences between monolinguals and bilinguals when it comes to executive functions are not always apparent. It appears that research on bilingualism is at a turning point. We need to pursue a new approach to understand, beyond those individual examples of executive functions, how the bilingual mind works. We have attempted to address this challenge by testing whether bilinguals and monolinguals differ in terms of how accurately they can assess their own performances. This ability is called meta cognition and is associated with other areas where bilinguals have been shown to have an advantage. In our research, we presented participants with a situation in which they had to observe two circles on a screen and guess which one contained more dots. Sometimes the difference was obvious, making the decision easy, while at other times the decision was very difficult (for example, one circle contained 50 dots and the other 49). Participants were then asked to determine how confident they were in their decision on a scale from less to more confident than normal. During the course of two experiments, we found that bilinguals and monolinguals were equally likely to choose the circle containing the highest number of dots. However, monolinguals were better able than bilinguals to discriminate between when they were right and when they were wrong. In other words, bilinguals had less insight into their performance than monolinguals. This went against our initial predictions, as we expected to find a bilingual advantage in meta cognitive processing. These results indicate that bilingualism may be associated with cognitive disadvantages as well as benefits. 1. From Paragraph 2 we can learn that nowadays the scientific community______. A. has denied the special benefits of bilingualism B. has changed its way to understand how the bilingual mind works C. thinks there is almost no difference between monolinguals and bilinguals D. tries to prove whether monolinguals have more advantages than bilinguals 2. How is the last paragraph mainly developed? A. By analyzing causes. B. By describing a process. C. By following time order. D. By making a comparison. 3. What is the author's attitude towards bilingualism? A. Supportive. B. Doubtful. C. Objective. D. Ambiguous.