皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
搜题
【简答题】
It’s good to talk’, so some people say. When I commute into London, there are certainly plenty of people conversing on their mobile phones – sometimes too loudly – discussing and sharing personal details with a friend. For me, it’s strange that they talk as though the person is sitting next to them, when they don’t even acknowledge the person who is actually sitting beside them. Many of us spend part of each day surrounded by strangers, whether on our daily commute, or sitting in a park or a cafe. But most of them remain just that – strangers. However, new evidence has shown that plucking up the courage to strike up a conversation might be good for our health. Nicholas Epley from the University of Chicago and Juliana Schroeder from the University of California are behavioural scientists. They looked at this silent relationship and whether solitude is a more positive experience than interacting with strangers, or if people misunderstand the consequences of distant social connections . They found that many people feel uncomfortable and intimidated talking to others and their research suggested that when we make an initial conversation “we consistently underestimate how much a new person likes us.” It seems we carry a negative voice in our head telling us all the things that could go wrong and why someone wouldn’t want to converse with us. Their research involved an experiment with a group of Chicago commuters and found that “every participant in our experiment who actually tried to talk to a stranger found the person sitting next to them was happy to chat .” From this and other research, the conclusion is that connecting with strangers is surprisingly pleasant and it has a positive impact on our wellbeing . Gillian Sandstrom, a social psychologist from Essex University in the UK, told the BBC that “people are in a better mood after they reach out and have a conversation, however minimal.” It’s true that talking can make you feel happier and happiness can lead to better mental health. However, if you’re an introvert , the thought of speaking to someone new might make you anxious . But the American research found “both extroverts and introverts are happier when they are asked to behave in an extroverted manner.” So maybe, if you’re a loner, it’s time to come out of your shell and make some small talk with a stranger – it could be the beginning of a new friendship.
拍照语音搜题,微信中搜索"皮皮学"使用
参考答案:
参考解析:
知识点:
.
..
皮皮学刷刷变学霸
举一反三
【单选题】某患者,女性,65岁,冠心病心绞痛史8年,无高血压史,夜间突发心前区疼痛8小时入院。入院时血压为150/90 mmHg(20/12kPa),经心电图检查,诊断急性前壁心肌梗死。 最可能的心电图表现为 ( )
A.
Ⅱ、Ⅲ、aVF出现异常Q波,伴ST段弓背向上抬高
B.
V1~V4出现异常Q波伴ST段弓背向上抬高
C.
V1~V4出现冠状T波
D.
频发室性早搏
E.
Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞
【简答题】女性,65岁。冠心病心绞痛史8年,无高血压史,夜间突发心前区疼痛8小时入院,入院时血压为150/90mmHg(20/12kPa),经心电图检查,诊断急性前壁心肌梗死。最可能的心电图表现为 ( )。
【单选题】患者女性,65岁。冠心病心绞痛史8年,无高血压史,夜间突发心前区疼痛6小时人院,入院时血压150/90mmHg,经心电图检查,诊断急性前壁心肌梗死,此时最具特征性的实验室改变是
A.
血清LDH水平增高
B.
血清AST水平增高
C.
血清ALT水平增高
D.
血清CK-MB水平增高
E.
血清肌红蛋白减少
【单选题】患者女性,65岁。冠心病心绞痛史8年,无高血压史,夜间突发心前区疼痛6小时入院,入院时血压150/90mmHg,经心电图检查,诊断急性前壁心肌梗死。此时最具特征性的实验室改变是
A.
血清LDH水平增高
B.
血清AST水平增高
C.
血清ALT水平增高
D.
血清CK-MB水平增高
E.
血清肌红蛋白减少
【简答题】患者女性,26岁。主诉:腹痛、腹泻1年。既往史:既往有肺结核病史5年查体:贫血貌,右下腹压痛,无反跳痛。
【多选题】触电事故分为电击和电伤,电击是电流直接作用与人体所造成的伤害;电伤是电流转化为热能、机械能等其他形式的能量对人体产生的伤害。人体触电时可同时遭受电击和电伤,电击的主要特征有( )
A.
致命电流小;
B.
人体表面受伤后有大面积明显痕迹;
C.
主要伤害是人的皮肤和肌肉
D.
受伤害的严重程度与电流的种类有关
E.
受伤害程度与电流大小有关
【单选题】患者,女性,65岁。冠心病心绞痛史8年,无高血压史,夜间突发心前区疼痛6小时入院,入院时血压150/90 mmHg,经心电图检查,诊断为急性前壁心肌梗死。此时最具特征性的实验室改变是
A.
血清LDH水平增高
B.
血清AST水平增高
C.
血清ALT水平增高
D.
血清CK - MB水平增高
E.
血清肌红蛋白减少
【简答题】根据下列题干,回答 126~130 题: 女性,65岁。冠心病心绞痛史8年,无高血压史,夜间突发心前区疼痛8小时人院,人院时血压为150/90mmHg(20/12kPa),经心电图检查,诊断急性前壁心肌梗死。 第 126 题 最可能的心电图表现为( )。
【单选题】某女性患者,46岁,低热、干咳2周,经胸部X片诊断为浸润性肺结核。既往有高血压史5年,痛风史3年,口服药物治疗。在患者进行抗结核治疗时,应避免使用的药物是
A.
异烟肼
B.
利福平
C.
乙胺酰胺
D.
吡嗪酰胺
E.
链霉素
相关题目: