皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
搜题
【简答题】
Another school year——what for ? John Ciardi Let me tell you one of the earliest disasters in my career as a teacher. It was January of 1940 and I was fresh out of graduate school starting my first semester at the University of Kansas City. Part of the student body was a beanpole with hair on top who came into my class, sat down, folded his arms, and looked at me as if to say "All right, teach me something." Two weeks later we started Hamlet. Three weeks later he came into my office with his hands on his hips. "Look," he said, "I came here to be a pharmacist. Why do I have to read this stuff" And not having a book of his own to point to, he pointed to mine which was lying on the desk. New as I was to the faculty, I could have told this specimen a number of things. I could have pointed out that he had enrolled, not in a drugstore-mechanics school, but in a college and that at the end of his course meant to reach for a scroll that read Bachelor of Science. It would not read: Qualified Pill-Grinding Technician. It would certify that he had specialized in pharmacy, but it would further certify that he had been exposed to some of the ideas mankind has generated within its history. That is to say, he had not entered a technical training school but a university and in universities students enroll for both training and education. I could have told him all this, but it was fairly obvious he wasn't going to be around long enough for it to matter. Nevertheless, I was young and I had a high sense of duty and I tried to put it this way: "For the rest of your life," I said, "your days are going to average out to about twenty-four hours. They will be a little shorter when you are in love, and a little longer when you are out of love, but the average will tend to hold. For eight of these hours, more or less, you will be asleep." Then for about eight hours of each working day you will, I hope, be usefully employed. Assume you have gone through pharmacy school — or engineering, or law school, or whatever — during those eight hours you will be using your professional skills. You will see to it that the cyanide stays out of the aspirin, that the bull doesn't jump the fence, or that your client doesn't go to the electric chair as a result of your incompetence. These are all useful pursuits. They involve skills every man must respect, and they can all bring you basic satisfactions. Along with everything else, they will probably be what puts food on your table, supports your wife, and rears your children. They will be your income, and may it always suffice." "But having finished the day's work, what do you do with those other eight hours Let's say you go home to your family. What sort of family are you raising? Will the children ever be exposed to a reasonably penetrating idea at home? Will you be presiding over a family that maintains some contact with the great democratic intellect? Will there be a book in the house? Will there be a painting a reasonably sensitive man can look at without shuddering? Will the kids ever get to hear Bach?" That is about what I said, but this particular pest was not interested. "Look," he said, "you professors raise your kids your way; I'll take care of my own. Me, I'm out to make money." "I hope you make a lot of it," I told him, "because you're going to be badly stuck for something to do when you're not signing checks." Fourteen years later I am still teaching, and I am here to tell you that the business of the college is not only to train you, but to put you in touch with what the best human minds have thought. If you have no time for Shakespeare, for a basic look at philosophy, for the continuity of the fine arts, for that lesson of man's development we call history — then you have no business being in college. You are on your way to being that new species of mechanized savage, the push-button Neanderthal. Our colleges inevitably graduate a number of such life forms, but it cannot be said that they went to college; rather the college went through them — without making contact. No one gets to be a human being unaided. There is not time enough in a single lifetime to invent for oneself everything one needs to know in order to be a civilized human. Assume, for example, that you want to be a physicist. You pass the great stone halls of, say, M. I. T., and there cut into the stone are the names of the scientists. The chances are that few, if any, of you will leave your names to be cut into those stones. Yet any of you who managed to stay awake through part of a high school course in physics, knows more about physics than did many of those great scholars of the past. You know more because they left you what they knew, because you can start from what the past learned for you. And as this is true of the techniques of mankind, so it is true of mankind's spiritual resources. Most of these resources, both technical and spiritual, are stored in books. Books are man's peculiar accomplishment. When you have read a book, you have added to your human experience. Read Homer and your mind includes a piece of Homer's mind. Through books you can acquire at least fragments of the mind and experience of Virgil, Dante, Shakespeare — the list is endless. For a great book is necessarily a gift; it offers you a life you have not the time to live yourself, and it takes you into a world you have not the time to travel in literal time. A civilized mind is, in essence, one that contains many such lives and many such worlds. If you are too much in a hurry, or too arrogantly proud of your own limitations, to accept as a gift to your humanity some pieces of the minds of Aristotle, or Chaucer, or Einstein, you are neither a developed human nor a useful citizen of a democracy. I think it was La Rochefoucauld who said that most people would never fall in love if they hadn't read about it. He might have said that no one would ever manage to become human if they hadn't read about it. I speak, I'm sure, for the faculty of the liberal arts college and for the faculties of the specialized schools as well, when I say that a university has no real existence and no real purpose except as it succeeds in putting you in touch, both as specialists and as humans, with those human minds your human mind needs to include. The faculty, by its very existence, says implicitly: "We have been aided by many people, and by many books, in our attempt to make ourselves some sort of storehouse of human experience. We are here to make available to you, as best we can, that expertise."
拍照语音搜题,微信中搜索"皮皮学"使用
参考答案:
参考解析:
知识点:
.
..
皮皮学刷刷变学霸
举一反三
【单选题】––How are you doing? ––___.
A.
Fine, thanks
B.
I'm Lily.
C.
Yes, please.
D.
No, thanks.
【单选题】下列对词作分析不恰当的一项是:
A.
大江东去,浪淘尽,千古风流人物。 开篇即抒情, 起笔颇有气势,从着笔,空间巨大; 千古风流人物 的历史时空广阔,英雄豪杰无数;将此二者联系起来,组成一个极为辽阔悠久的时空背景。
B.
故垒西边,人道是,三国周郎赤壁。 作者把目光从江涛转向赤壁,既点出了赤壁的历史意义,也为下片歌颂周瑜埋下了伏笔。
C.
遥想公谨当年,小乔初嫁了,雄姿英发。 描写了周瑜风华正茂的形象。插入 小乔初嫁了 这一生活细节,是为了突出小乔貌美,足以与周瑜相配,美人英雄相得益彰。
D.
羽扇纶巾,谈笑间、樯橹灰飞烟灭。 描写了周瑜手执羽扇,头戴纶巾的文士风度, 突出了周瑜蔑视强敌的英雄气概。 谈笑间 三字,字字千斤,力透纸背,充分反映了周瑜当年赤壁破曹时那种轻而易举的神态。
【单选题】–How are you getting on there? –Don’t worry. ______ goes well.
A.
Everything
B.
Something
C.
Nothing
D.
Anything
【单选题】–How are you? – .
A.
Fine, thank you. And you?
B.
Long time no see.
C.
Hello.
【单选题】下列对这首词分析不恰当的的一项是( )
A.
“ 大江东去 , 浪淘尽 , 千古风流人物 ”, 开篇即景抒情,起笔颇有气势 , 从长江着笔,空间巨大 ;“ 千古风流人物 ” 的历史时空广阔,英雄豪杰无数 ; 将两者联系起来 , 组成一个极为辽阔悠久的时空背景。
B.
“ 故垒西边,人道是 , 三国周郎赤壁 ”, 作者把目光从江涛转向赤壁,既点出了赤壁的历史意义,也为下片歌颂周瑜埋下了伏笔。
C.
“ 遥想公谨当年 . 小乔初嫁了 , 雄姿英发 " 描写了周瑜风华正茂的形象。插人 “ 小乔初嫁了 ” 这一生活细节,是为了突出小乔貌美,足以与周瑜相配,美人英雄相得益彰。
D.
“ 羽扇纶巾 , 谈笑间,强虏灰飞烟灭 ” 描写了周瑜手执羽扇,头戴纶巾的文士风度,突出了周瑜蔑视强敌的英雄气概。 “ 谈笑间 " 三字,字字千斤,力透纸背,充分反映了周瑜当年赤壁破曹时那种轻而易举的神态。
【单选题】–How are you getting on there? –Don’t worry. ______ goes well.
A.
Everything
B.
Anything
C.
Something
D.
Nothing
【单选题】下列对文章内容分析不恰当的一项是( )
A.
第二段 “日出而林霩开,云归而岩穴暝”采用对偶修辞手法,描写了山间变幻多姿的早晚景物,两幅画面对比鲜明。
B.
第三段 ”颓然乎其间者,大守醉也”,既照应了首段太守“饮少辄醉”,也凸显了作者政治失意、仕途坎坷的内心抑郁和苦闷。
C.
本文除第一段外,每段开头都用领起词语引出下文。从 ”若夫”到“至于”到“已而”,展开了从景物到游乐到归来的一幅幅画卷。
D.
这篇文辞优美的山水游记,通过众人游、太守宴众宾欢、太守醉四个画面,展现了太守与民同乐的美好场景。
【单选题】下列对选文的分析,不恰当的一项是 ( )
A.
选文按照时间顺序,介绍了过去的年从腊八到辞灶日的情况。
B.
选文通过对腊八和辞灶日情况的介绍突出了过去的年的特点,这种特点具有极大的客观性,真实地再现了过去的年的情况。
C.
作者详写了庙里施粥的场景和吃饺子的情形,在描写中营造了一种氛围,突出了一种民俗,具有较强的文化意义。
D.
作者运用细节描写的方法,再现了过去的年的特点,把读者带到了过去的生活中。
【简答题】下列对词作分析不恰当的一项是A. “大江东去,浪淘尽,千古风流人物。”开篇即景抒情,起笔颇有气势,从长江着笔,空间巨大;“千古风流人物”的历史时空广阔,英雄豪杰无数;将此二者联系起来,组成一个极为辽阔悠久的时空背景。 B. “故垒西边,人道是,三国周郎赤壁。” 作者把目光从江涛转向赤壁,既点出了赤壁的历史意义,也为下片歌颂周瑜埋下了伏笔。 C. “遥想公谨当年,小乔初嫁了,雄姿英发。”描写了周瑜风...
【简答题】请写出“遗忘”的定义:
相关题目: