Rail, who was 16 years old, purchased an $800 computer from Elco Electronics. Rail and Elco are located in a state where the age of majority is 18. On several occasions Rail returned the computer to Elco for repairs. Rail was very unhappy with the computer. Two days after reaching the age of 18, Rail was still frustrated with the computer's reliability, and returned it to Elco, demanding an $800 refund. Elco refused, claiming that Rail no longer had a right to disaffirm the contract. Elco's refusal is:
A.
Incorrect, because Rail disaffirmed the contract within a reasonable period of time after reaching the age of 18
B.
Correct, because Rail could have transferred good title to a good faith purchaser for value.
C.
Incorrect, because Rail could disaffirm the contract at any time.
D.
Correct, because Rail's multiple requests for service acted as a ratification of the contract