【单选题】A woman had lived in Apartment 123 in the same apartment complex for six years. On many prior occasions, the woman had hired the same handyman to perform odd jobs in her apartment. The woman, who was ...
A.
(A) The handyman, because the woman should have realized that he would replace the tile in Apartment 123.
B.
(B) The handyman, because even though no contract existed, he is entitled to quasi-contractual relief under the circumstances.
C.
(C) The woman, because the handyman id not replace the tile in the woman’s bathroom.
D.
(D) The woman, because no contract existed due to the mutual mistake of the parties.