If the motion is "cellphones should be banned during class", which one of the following is an example of evaluative argumentation?
A.
Cellphones should not be banned during class, because cell phones can be a great source of information and a great learning tool. Of course if used in a proper way. Teachers can include them as a tool and even provide apps for the students to use together as a class.
B.
Cellphones should be banned during class, because students should learn the old fashion way, without any use of technology because this is the best way to learn. Writing, calculus and other basic sciences should be learned as a basic for everything else without any technology.
C.
Cellphone should be banned during class, because they can put off radiation, which means that cell phones can cause brain tumors or acoustic nueromas (Colipie). If students are allowed to use their cell phone during school it will make it easier of a chance for kids to get some type of cancer.
D.
Cellphones should not be banned during class, because banning them will not stop them being used – it will simply push that use underground. Much better for the device to be visible on the desk than hidden under it. This way, teachers will know if the mobiles are being used outside of learning.