Consider the following argument. Homeless people should be allowed to occupy unused buildings that are owned by others (commonly referred to as “squatting”), as there are an estimated 700 000 empty properties in England that could be used as shelter. Any right that owners may claim to property is superseded by the rights of homeless people to shelter, as the right to shelter is an inalienable human right. This right to shelter applies in almost all cases of unoccupied properties, but of course would not apply if the property was only unoccupied in the short term. (Adapted from Vasudevan, A. (2011, November 3). The sinister logic behind criminalising squatting. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/nov/03/criminalising-squatting-law-trespass-homeless) “Any right that owners may claim to property is superseded by the rights of homeless people to shelter” is which part of the Toulmin model of argumentation? Check one option.