皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
搜题
【单选题】
请阅读Passage 2,完成第26—30题。 Passage 2 Until a decade or two ago, the centers of many Western cities were emptying while their edges were spreading. This was not for the reasons normally cited. Neither the car nor the motorway caused suburban sprawl, although they sped it up: cities were spreading before either came along. Nor was the flight to the suburbs caused by racism. Whites fled inner-city neighborhoods that were becoming black, but they also fled ones that were not. Planning and zoning rules encouraged sprawl, as did tax breaks for home ownership——but cities spread regardless of these. The real cause was mass affluence. As people grew richer, they demanded more privacy and space. Only a few could afford that in city centers; the rest moved out. The same process is now occurring in the developing world, but much more quickly. The pop-ulation density of metropolitan Beijing has collapsed since 1970, falling from 425 people per hectare to 65. Indian cities are following; Brazil's are ahead. And suburbanization has a long way to run. Beijing is now about as crowded as metropolitan Chicago was at its most closely packed, in the 1920s. Since then Chicago's density has fallen by almost three-quarters. This is welcome. Romantic notions of sociable, high-density living——notions pushed, for the most part, by people who themselves occupy rather spacious residences——ignore the squalor and lack of privacy to be found in Kinshasa, Mumbai or the other crowded cities of the poor world. Many of them are far too dense for dignified living, and need to spread out. The Western suburbs to which so many aspire are healthier than their detractors say. The modern Stepfords are no longer white monocultures, but that is progress. For every Ferguson there are many American suburbs that have quietly become black, Hispanic or Asian, or a blend of every-one. Picaresque accounts of decay overlook the fact that America's suburbs are half as criminal and a little more than half as poor as central cities. Even as urban centers revive, more Americans move from city centre to suburb than go the other way. But the West has also made mistakes, from which the rest of the world can learn. The first lesson is that suburban sprawl imposes costs on everyone. Suburbanites tend to use more roads and consume more carbon than urbanites (though perhaps not as much as distant commuters forced out by green belts). But this damage can be alleviated by a carbon tax, by toll roads and by charging for parking. Many cities in the emerging world have followed the foolish American practice of re-quiring property developers to provide a certain number of parking spaces for every building——something that makes commuting by car much more attractive than it would be otherwise. Scrap-ping them would give public transport a chance. The second is that it is foolish to try to stop the spread of suburbs. Green belts, the most ef-fective method for doing this, push up property prices and encourage long-distance commuting. The cost of housing in London, already astronomical, went up by 19% in the past year, reflecting not just the city's strong economy but also the impossibility of building on its edges. The insistence on big minimum lot sizes in some American suburbs and rural areas has much the same effect. Cities that try to prevent growth through green belts often end up weakening themselves, as Seoul has done. A wiser policy would be to plan for huge expansion. Acquire strips of land for roads and rail-ways, and chunks for parks, before the city sprawls into them. New York's 19th-century governors decided where Central Park was going to go long before the city reached it. New York went on to develop in a way that they could not have imagined, but the park is still there. This is not the state control of the new-town planner——that confident soul who believes he knows where people will want to live and work, and how they will get from one to the other. It is the realism needed to manage the inevitable. A model of living that has broadly worked well in the West is spreading, adapting to local conditions as it goes. We should all look forward to the time when Chinese and Indian teenagers write sulky songs about the appalling dullness of suburbia. For which of the following reasons did the west move out of cities? 查看材料
A.
They didn't need to pay higher taxes when living in suburbs.
B.
Car industry rapidly developed and motorways swiftly emerged.
C.
They discriminated against the black people living in city centers.
D.
The richer they grew, the more demand they had on privacy and space.
拍照语音搜题,微信中搜索"皮皮学"使用
参考答案:
参考解析:
知识点:
.
..
皮皮学刷刷变学霸
举一反三
【单选题】静态的外汇是以( )表示的可用于国际之间结算的支付手段。
A.
本国货币
B.
外国货币
C.
外国有价证券
D.
外国金币
【单选题】假设干离子交换树脂是全交换容量为 5mmol/g ,浸泡水后,含水率为 40% ,湿视密度为 800g /L ,那么湿树脂的交换容量为( )。
A.
2100 mmol/L
B.
2200 mmol/L
C.
2300 mmol/L
D.
2400 mmol/L
【判断题】静态的外汇是以外币表示的、用以对外结算的国际支付工具或支付手段。( )
A.
正确
B.
错误
【单选题】下列计算方法中,常用( )来进行竖向荷载作用下框架的内力分析。
A.
反弯点法
B.
底部剪力法
C.
D值法
D.
分层法
【单选题】下面互利共生关系,不属于种群之间的是()。
A.
蚂蚁为蚜虫放哨
B.
原生动物鞭毛虫促进牛的消化
C.
牛尾鸟帮助犀牛消除寄生的虫子
D.
白蚁消化道中的原生生物帮助白蚁消化木屑
【单选题】下面不属于种群之间互利共生关系的是()。
A.
白蚁消化道中的原生生物帮助白蚁消化木屑
B.
蚂蚁为蚜虫放哨
C.
原生动物鞭毛虫促进牛的消化
D.
牛尾鸟帮助犀牛消除寄生的虫子
【单选题】下面不属于种群之间互利共生关系的是()。
A.
白蚁消化道中的原生生物帮助白蚁消化木屑
B.
蚂蚁为蚜虫放哨
C.
原生动物鞭毛虫促进牛的消化
D.
牛尾鸟帮助犀牛消除寄生的虫子
【单选题】静态的外汇是指()
A.
国际结算中的支付手段
B.
外国货币
C.
金融活动
D.
金融资产
【单选题】下列计算方法中,常用( )来进行竖向荷载作用下框架的内力分析。
A.
反弯点法
B.
底部剪力法
C.
D值法
D.
分层法
【多选题】静态的外汇是指
A.
以外币表示的可以用作国际清偿的金融资产
B.
把一国货币兑换为另一国货币以清偿国际间债务的金融活动
C.
以外币表示的用于国际结算的支付手段
D.
外国货币、外币支付凭证、外币有价证券
相关题目: